![]() |
Liberal Democrats in Business News and views from the Lib Dem Treasury, Trade and Industry Teams and the Liberal Democrat Business Forum |
![]() |
| Savour Words - National Poetry Day | <info@libdemsinbusiness.org.uk> |
Equitable Life: Government May Have Case To Answer In Europe10.30.24am GMT Wed 10th Mar 2004 Vince Cable MP, Liberal Democrat Shadow Chancellor, responding to the decision by current and former policyholders of Equitable Life to submit a formal complaint against the UK regulatory authorities to the Commission of the European Communities, said: "It is unsurprising that policyholders wish to take this matter to the European Union, where the British government may well have a case to answer." "It's clear that the Government presented an extremely selective account of the Penrose Report, carefully shifting responsibility onto the company and the previous Conservative administration." "But there were several quite specific failures in the regulation by government which could reasonably be said to amount to negligence."
Bookmark this story at:
[ Related News Stories:Wed 19th May 2004: [Equitable Life: Ombudsman Should Investigate Further] Wed 28th Apr 2004: [Equitable Life Must Avoid Wasting Limited Funds On Legal Action - Cable] Wed 31st Mar 2004: [Inequitable Decision By Equitable Life - Cable] Wed 24th Mar 2004: [Equitable Life Refuses To Release Vital Figures ] Wed 10th Mar 2004: [Charles Kennedy: Ombudsman Investigation Needed Into Regulation Of Equitable Life] Tue 24th Feb 2004: [Brown Cannot Duck Responsibility Over Equitable Life Losers] Fri 23rd Jan 2004: [Fraud Office Investigation Will Give New Hope To Equitable Life Losers - Cable] Tue 28th Oct 2003: [Equitable Life: Complaints Procedure "Totally Unacceptable"] Thu 27th Mar 2003: [Report Throws New Complexion On Equitable Life] Wed 12th Mar 2003: [Compensate All Equitable Life Victims, Not Just Complainants] Published and promoted by Liberal Democrats in Business, 4 Cowley Street, London SW1P 3NB. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |