![]() |
Liberal Democrats in Business News and views from the Lib Dem Treasury, Trade and Industry Teams and the Liberal Democrat Business Forum |
![]() |
| CAMRA Cider Month: www.camra.org.uk/cider | <info@libdemsinbusiness.org.uk> |
Royal Mail Still Has To Prove It Can Deliver10.33.59am GMT Thu 13th Nov 2003
Commenting on the announcement by Royal Mail of a pre-tax profit for the 6 months to September, Malcolm Bruce MP, Liberal Democrat Shadow Trade and Industry Secretary, said: "This good news is a step forward but these small profits will be wiped out by the consequences of the recent wild cat strikes." "Adam Crozier's reconstruction job is not made any easier by these figures, but it remains essential if the Royal Mail is to deliver for its customers. This small £3m pre-tax profit has been achieved on the basis of the 1p rise that the Government delayed for a year." "Management and workforce must ensure that damaging and expensive strike action is not repeated if the Royal Mail is to be successful as a state-owned company."
Bookmark this story at:
[ Related News Stories:Thu 4th Oct 2007: [Level Playing Field Needed To Save Royal Mail - Öpik] Mon 13th Aug 2007: [Royal Mail delivery changes will hit business - Opik] Mon 21st Feb 2005: [Royal Mail Must Improve Performance to Compete] Thu 18th Nov 2004: [Royal Mail Must Now Meet Targets - Bruce] Mon 1st Nov 2004: [Royal Mail Must Set Out Criteria For Post Office Closure Decisions] Thu 27th May 2004: [Royal Mail Profits: Little Comfort To Those Who Wait In Vain For The Post] Fri 30th Apr 2004: [Royal Mail Needs Comprehensive Investigation] [Royal Mail Must Get Their Act Together] Tue 27th Apr 2004: [Royal Mail Must Consult Businesses On Proposed Changes] Mon 15th Mar 2004: [Negotiation Muse Be Way Forward For Royal Mail] Tue 10th Feb 2004: Fri 31st Oct 2003: [Royal Mail Strike: Hewitt Must Protect National Postal System] Thu 30th Oct 2003: Published and promoted by Liberal Democrats in Business, 4 Cowley Street, London SW1P 3NB. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |